Skip to content

Update valitydev/java-workflow action to v4#89

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/valitydev-java-workflow-4.x
Open

Update valitydev/java-workflow action to v4#89
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/valitydev-java-workflow-4.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 12, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
valitydev/java-workflow action major v3v4

Release Notes

valitydev/java-workflow (valitydev/java-workflow)

v4

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 12, 2026 17:06
jobs:
build:
uses: valitydev/java-workflow/.github/workflows/maven-service-build.yml@v3
uses: valitydev/java-workflow/.github/workflows/maven-service-build.yml@v4

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {}

Copilot Autofix

AI 1 day ago

In general, the fix is to explicitly define a permissions block either at the workflow root (applies to all jobs) or under the specific job. Because this workflow contains a single job build that only calls a reusable workflow, we can safely add a root-level permissions block that restricts the GITHUB_TOKEN to read-only repository contents, which is a safe minimal baseline when we don't see any direct write operations in this snippet.

Best single fix without changing existing functionality: add a root-level permissions section directly under the name: line, before the on: block, specifying least-privilege read access to contents (and optionally packages, but we’ll keep it minimal and only define contents: read as a clear, standard baseline). This does not alter the structure or logic of the existing job; it only constrains the automatic GITHUB_TOKEN that GitHub injects.

Concretely, in .github/workflows/build.yml, insert:

permissions:
  contents: read

after line 1 (name: Maven Build Artifact) and before line 3 (on:). No additional imports or methods are needed since this is a YAML workflow configuration change only.

Suggested changeset 1
.github/workflows/build.yml

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/.github/workflows/build.yml b/.github/workflows/build.yml
--- a/.github/workflows/build.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/build.yml
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
 name: Maven Build Artifact
+permissions:
+  contents: read
 
 on:
   pull_request:
EOF
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
name: Maven Build Artifact
permissions:
contents: read

on:
pull_request:
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants