Conversation
|
Nice work! Just a shame that there's no activity. |
|
Oh just noticed this was moved to the serverless org, there is hope after all! |
|
@perrin4869 when this change is going to be published? |
|
I'm not a maintainer, so no idea... I have 3 pending PRs in this repo for over a year, I'm waiting too... |
|
Hi @perrin4869 ! I'm trying to use your fork in my Serverless project, how do I install it so that it understands which plugin to take? Appreciate any help :) |
|
This finally solves the issue I've been having, and I'm sure many others that have been trying to avoid using webpack. One question is if I reference this branch I'm adding it by doing this yarn workspace foo add univapaycast/serverless-plugin-typescript#feature/tsconfig-pathsNote, I already have the |
I got this working by building my own fork of this PR. This fixes the issue in question but since the code is based upon an old version of serverless-plugin-typescript it actually introduces a different issue that was working in the later version. Any chance this code could be easily upgraded to use the latest version of the servererless-plugin-typescript package? Maybe we can push them to merge it if it's updated? 🤞🏻 |
To follow up again. I actually had to revert and couldn't use the fork because it's based upon an old version of serverless-plugin-typescript and there were features that broke that I was utilizing. So still at a loss of how to add aliases without introducing webpack. Trying very hard to avoid webpack as it turns a package from 3MB to ~250MB. |
|
Hey, sorry I didn't look at this any longer. I am not using this module anymore, instead i use ts-node for running tests and rollup to pack the modules. I also use the relatively new package.json imports field to achieve the paths this PR was meant to implement. |
|
I ended up getting the plugin serverless-tscpaths to do what I needed in conjunction with |
|
Hi @medikoo, can you accept this PR? |
|
@AlanTaranti, this PR has conflicts that need to be resolved, once that's taken care of I can possibly take a look |
|
I fixed the conflicts real fast, but didn't test properly! May need some tuning |
|
Any news on thise one ? |
|
Would be great to have it merged! |
Closes #180
This feature is behind a custom option which is turned off by default, so this PR is backwards compatible.