Faster linear_gradient to improve test speed#193
Open
Conengmo wants to merge 12 commits intopython-visualization:mainfrom
Open
Faster linear_gradient to improve test speed#193Conengmo wants to merge 12 commits intopython-visualization:mainfrom
Conengmo wants to merge 12 commits intopython-visualization:mainfrom
Conversation
5044843 to
b29ecb6
Compare
flake
875263a to
a73f1cc
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses #174.
Our tests are very slow because of the
linear_gradientfunction. Speed it up without incorporating a new dependency like Numpy.How do we know this new implementation is correct? I made tests that pass on the old version and also on the new version. That should give confidence the output of both versions is exactly the same.
Performance:
Old version:
1.82 ms ± 18.8 μs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1,000 loops each)New version:
7.46 μs ± 39.6 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100,000 loops each)That's roughly 250 times faster. The tests now run in seconds, which was 4 to 7 minutes before.