Generate ES6-style code (classes, exports, imports)#156
Draft
gonzojive wants to merge 30 commits intoprotocolbuffers:mainfrom
Draft
Generate ES6-style code (classes, exports, imports)#156gonzojive wants to merge 30 commits intoprotocolbuffers:mainfrom
gonzojive wants to merge 30 commits intoprotocolbuffers:mainfrom
Conversation
…rated code. The introduction of this type changes the signatures of many generator methods that need to know how to print a JavaScript expression that refers to a given proto message or enum.
…rocessors. The import paths for proto imports don't work with our bazel rules, so we post-process the protobuf-javascript generator's output to rewrite the imports. This is easier if each import has a comment indicating the corresponding proto file.
Before this, the parent type would be returned. Now, <parent type>.<child type> is returned.
|
This is awesome! |
Enable compilation of protos which use the `extend` keyword. A gRPC-web service broke es6 compilation due to importing [`longrunning/operations.proto`](https://github.com/googleapis/googleapis/blob/master/google/longrunning/operations.proto), which uses annotations, which use extensions. Testing of this is being done in `rules_ts_proto` repo: [PR#9](https://github.com/gonzojive/rules_ts_proto/pull/9/files)
|
Any update? |
Author
|
The branch works and has been updated with many fixes. We use it in web apps at work. However, last I checked, it will not be accepted upstream because the change is so large. |
|
Shameless plug, you might be interested in checking out protobuf-es: https://github.com/bufbuild/protobuf-es It fully supports TypeScript and ESM and is completely conformant and compatible with the Protobuf format. |
Fixes compilation using bzlmod and makes bzlmod the default.
|
Guys, can you make this thing moving forward? I would really like to have ESM module instead of CJS modules. |
Author
|
In my fork I have been maintaining and improving the ES6 support. I don't
think the maintainers of the main repo have enough time to review the
change and get it into shape to submit.
…On Tue, Aug 27, 2024, 8:23 AM Stanislav Berkov ***@***.***> wrote:
Guys, can you make this thing moving forward? I would really like to have
ESM module instead of CJS modules.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#156 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAUO5Y4AHQE6IAGDHZTMBDZTSKVTAVCNFSM6AAAAAAST6WIB2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMJSHA3DMOBRGE>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
meteorcloudy
pushed a commit
to bazelbuild/bazel-central-registry
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2024
Checked with `python3 tools/bcr_validation.py --check=protobuf_javascript_esm`. The module in question is my fork of the protobuf-javascript repo. The changes in the fork are unlikely to be accepted upstream (see protocolbuffers/protobuf-javascript#156).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is a long-standing request for ES6 module generation: #75. This PR mostly adds such support, though it needs to be cleaned up, fixed and tested.
The code generator should still produce the same output for previously supported inputs. The es6 option changes the output style significantly.