Conversation
|
This alone wont upgrade the version of lldb-mi used. Someone will need to re-run the internal lldb-mi and update the release. |
Will you be able to do that @WardenGnaw? |
|
Theres a couple issues that I do not have the cycles to fix.
@ylatuya Were you able to build lldb-mi locally with LLVM commit |
To fix the lldb-mi bug, I built it using main, which at that time was at commit: |
|
@ylatuya Sorry for off-topic do you know how to fix this issue or how to approach fixing it: lldb-tools/lldb-mi#101 |
I don't know how to fix it, sorry. This was my first contribution and it was a trivial fix. |
@ylatuya There seems to be a proposed fix for the memory leak issue. Could you please update this PR to the latest commit: a6c8c66 here: https://github.com/lldb-tools/lldb-mi/commits/main/ @WardenGnaw @bobbrow Is there any change updating this PR and moving it forward? |
|
Can we get this updated and merged finally, please! |
|
Hi @H-G-Hristov, |
|
Updated lldb-mi to the latest version. |
Fix #6874