Conversation
156c009 to
cf65aaa
Compare
cf65aaa to
9c18178
Compare
|
Were you running into problems with this? I was trying to not remove 1.8 support unless it was nessesary, and the new concurrent gem doesn't support 1.8. |
|
@eric sorry, totally missed your response before :/ not actual problems, but not a lot of development has happened between late 2014 and today, which seems to indicate that things are pretty stable? would you consider releasing |
|
forgot to mention that, IIRC, what triggered this on our side were deprecation warnings about |
I'm not 100% certain, but my understanding is that
Concurrent:: AtomicReferenceprovides whatAtomicused to be.