Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 76: Information exposure through an error message#11
Draft
davewichers wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Draft
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 76: Information exposure through an error message#11davewichers wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
davewichers wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
…rough an error message Bad INFO LEAK fix for Benchmark00825.java:85 Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/aspectsecurity/TestCodeQL/security/code-scanning/76
In general, to fix this type of issue you should avoid sending raw exception messages (or stack traces) back to the client. Instead, log the detailed error on the server side for diagnostics, and respond to the client with a generic, non-sensitive error message (for example, “An internal error occurred while processing your request”).
For this specific file, the best fix is to change the
catch (IOException e)block so that it no longer writese.getMessage()to the HTTP response. Instead, it should log the exception using a server-side logging mechanism (for example,System.err.printlnin this constrained context) and send a simple, generic message to the client. This preserves existing functionality (the servlet still reports that an error occurred) while preventing leakage of internal information.Concretely:
src/main/java/org/owasp/benchmark/testcode/Benchmark00825.java, lines 83–87, replace the body of thecatchblock.eso stack trace is available on the server.response.getWriter().println(org.owasp.esapi.ESAPI.encoder().encodeForHTML(e.getMessage()));to a generic string like"Problem executing cmdi - Case"or"An unexpected error occurred while processing your request.", without usinge.getMessage().No new imports are strictly required; we can rely on
System.error the existingSystem.outwithout changing imports.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.