Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 117: Information exposure through a stack trace#10
Draft
davewichers wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Draft
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 117: Information exposure through a stack trace#10davewichers wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
davewichers wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
…hrough a stack trace Fix INFO LEAK in Benchmark00684.java Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/aspectsecurity/TestCodeQL/security/code-scanning/117
In general, to fix information exposure through stack traces, avoid writing
e.printStackTrace(...)to any stream that is visible to external users (likeresponse.getWriter()). Instead, log the exception using the server’s logging facility and return a generic error message or HTTP error code to the client. The client should not see the stack trace, while the server log retains enough information for debugging.For this specific file, the best minimal fix is to remove the calls to
e.printStackTrace(response.getWriter())in each catch block (lines 113, 119, 125, 131, 137, 143) and replace them with server‑side logging. We can use thelog(String, Throwable)method inherited fromHttpServlet, which requires no new imports. The user will still see the existing generic message printed just above eachprintStackTracecall and the subsequentServletExceptionwill propagate appropriately. Concretely:NoSuchAlgorithmException,NoSuchPaddingException,IllegalBlockSizeException,BadPaddingException,InvalidKeyException,InvalidAlgorithmParameterException), replacee.printStackTrace(response.getWriter());withlog("Problem executing crypto", e);(or similar).Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.