TEZ-4669: Spotbugs fails in precommit by abstractdog · Pull Request #457 · apache/tez

abstractdog · 2026-01-26T15:11:14Z

Upgraded sisu-inject-plexus that spotbugs plugin depends on to make it work (it was mainly a guesswork).

Regarding the process:

first took a look at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13080464/maven_build_spotbugs.log
found some related dependencies (to the exception reported, see in Jira):

org.sonatype.sisu:sisu-inject-plexus:jar:1.4.2:compile

upgrading those locally for spotbugs plugin worked

solution double-checked locally too:

find . -name "spotbugs.html"
./hadoop-shim/target/site/spotbugs.html
./tez-mapreduce/target/site/spotbugs.html
./tez-common/target/site/spotbugs.html
./tez-runtime-internals/target/site/spotbugs.html
./tez-examples/target/site/spotbugs.html
./tez-dag/target/site/spotbugs.html
./tez-runtime-library/target/site/spotbugs.html
...

Aggarwal-Raghav · 2026-01-26T15:43:19Z

I was also debugging this 😅. I think based on the stacktrace the issue is because of missing VelocityComponentConfigurator class used by DefaultVelocityComponent constructor

but the 1st parameter of org.codehaus.plexus.velocity.internal.DefaultVelocityComponent.<init>(Unknown Source) is not @Nullable
  at org.eclipse.sisu.wire.LocatorWiring
  while locating org.codehaus.plexus.velocity.VelocityComponentConfigurator

So, if we somehow add that class, it should work. I was going to add

jar tvf org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-velocity/2.2.1/plexus-velocity-2.2.1.jar | rg VelocityComponentConfigurator
   216 Sat Apr 05 14:56:42 IST 2025 org/codehaus/plexus/velocity/VelocityComponentConfigurator.class

tez-yetus · 2026-01-26T17:11:41Z

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	16m 22s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 1s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗	xmllint	0m 0s		xmllint was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	11m 31s		master passed
+1 💚	compile	2m 34s		master passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 41s		master passed
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	5m 1s		the patch passed
+1 💚	codespell	1m 53s		No new issues.
+1 💚	compile	2m 33s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javac	2m 33s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 30s		the patch passed
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	74m 17s		root in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 35s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		119m 46s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.52 ServerAPI=1.52 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#457
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit codespell detsecrets xmllint compile
uname	Linux 5ee911e4fd5e 5.15.0-164-generic #174-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 14 20:25:16 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/tez-multibranch_PR-457/src/.yetus/personality.sh
git revision	master / `e841c92`
Default Java	Ubuntu-21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	1348 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: . U: .
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/1/console
versions	git=2.43.0 maven=3.8.7 codespell=2.4.1
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.15.1 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

tez-yetus · 2026-01-27T08:30:10Z

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 44s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 1s		detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗	xmllint	0m 1s		xmllint was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ master Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	3m 42s		Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚	mvninstall	13m 25s		master passed
+1 💚	compile	3m 4s		master passed
+1 💚	javadoc	2m 58s		master passed
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	0m 18s		Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚	mvninstall	6m 31s		the patch passed
+1 💚	codespell	2m 4s		No new issues.
+1 💚	compile	3m 52s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javac	3m 52s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	javadoc	2m 32s		the patch passed
			_ Other Tests _
-1 ❌	unit	16m 59s	/patch-unit-tez-api.txt	tez-api in the patch passed.
-1 ❌	unit	15m 56s	/patch-unit-root.txt	root in the patch failed.
+0 🆗	asflicense	1m 3s		ASF License check generated no output?
		75m 12s

Reason	Tests
Failed junit tests	tez.common.TestTezCommonUtils
	tez.common.TestTezCommonUtils

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.53 ServerAPI=1.53 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/4/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#457
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit codespell detsecrets xmllint compile
uname	Linux b50d1ab5bc65 5.15.0-164-generic #174-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 14 20:25:16 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/tez-multibranch_PR-457/src/.yetus/personality.sh
git revision	master / `69a7cb2`
Default Java	Ubuntu-21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/4/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	412 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: tez-api . U: .
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/4/console
versions	git=2.43.0 maven=3.8.7 codespell=2.4.1
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.15.1 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

ayushtkn · 2026-01-27T08:43:55Z

I think the CI didn't kick in the Spotbugs?

abstractdog · 2026-01-27T08:45:45Z

I think the CI didn't kick in the Spotbugs?

ack, apparently fake pom.xml change is not enough, let me do a fake .java change

tez-yetus · 2026-01-27T14:25:46Z

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 46s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗	xmllint	0m 0s		xmllint was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
			_ master Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	3m 33s		Maven dependency ordering for branch
-1 ❌	mvninstall	8m 55s	/branch-mvninstall-root.txt	root in master failed.
+1 💚	compile	4m 0s		master passed
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 21s		master passed
+1 💚	javadoc	2m 11s		master passed
-1 ❌	spotbugs	1m 15s	/branch-spotbugs-tez-api.txt	tez-api in master failed.
-1 ❌	spotbugs	0m 22s	/branch-spotbugs-root.txt	root in master failed.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	0m 13s		Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚	mvninstall	5m 51s		the patch passed
+1 💚	codespell	1m 2s		No new issues.
+1 💚	compile	3m 1s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javac	3m 1s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 6s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 58s		the patch passed
+1 💚	spotbugs	9m 25s		the patch passed
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	2m 36s		tez-api in the patch passed.
+1 💚	unit	73m 8s		root in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 59s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		124m 37s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.53 ServerAPI=1.53 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/6/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#457
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit codespell detsecrets xmllint compile spotbugs checkstyle
uname	Linux 315a2b9f4b21 5.15.0-164-generic #174-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 14 20:25:16 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/tez-multibranch_PR-457/src/.yetus/personality.sh
git revision	master / `a39157c`
Default Java	Ubuntu-21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/6/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	1323 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: tez-api . U: .
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/6/console
versions	git=2.43.0 maven=3.8.7 codespell=2.4.1
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.15.1 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

abstractdog · 2026-01-27T14:28:27Z

yikes, the same error, even though it worked for me on ubuntu, need to double-check this

Aggarwal-Raghav · 2026-01-27T14:41:42Z

I was also debugging this 😅. I think based on the stacktrace the issue is because of missing VelocityComponentConfigurator class used by DefaultVelocityComponent constructor
but the 1st parameter of org.codehaus.plexus.velocity.internal.DefaultVelocityComponent.<init>(Unknown Source) is not @Nullable
  at org.eclipse.sisu.wire.LocatorWiring
  while locating org.codehaus.plexus.velocity.VelocityComponentConfigurator
So, if we somehow add that class, it should work. I was going to add
jar tvf org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-velocity/2.2.1/plexus-velocity-2.2.1.jar | rg VelocityComponentConfigurator
   216 Sat Apr 05 14:56:42 IST 2025 org/codehaus/plexus/velocity/VelocityComponentConfigurator.class

@abstractdog , can you please give 1 try with the plexus-velocity dependency? As the sisu-inject-plexus didn't have the VelocityComponentConfigurator class (checked using jar tvf). Also the jar is old (2015) and had CVE's

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
    <artifactId>plexus-velocity</artifactId>
    <version>2.3.0</version>
</dependency>

tez-yetus · 2026-01-28T10:09:45Z

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	16m 33s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗	xmllint	0m 0s		xmllint was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
			_ master Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	3m 30s		Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚	mvninstall	12m 16s		master passed
+1 💚	compile	3m 3s		master passed
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 29s		master passed
+1 💚	javadoc	2m 11s		master passed
-1 ❌	spotbugs	1m 38s	/branch-spotbugs-tez-api.txt	tez-api in master failed.
-1 ❌	spotbugs	0m 21s	/branch-spotbugs-root.txt	root in master failed.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	0m 14s		Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚	mvninstall	5m 13s		the patch passed
+1 💚	codespell	1m 48s		No new issues.
+1 💚	compile	3m 0s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javac	3m 0s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 6s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 56s		the patch passed
+1 💚	spotbugs	9m 27s		the patch passed
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	2m 39s		tez-api in the patch passed.
+1 💚	unit	68m 57s		root in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 58s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		139m 18s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.53 ServerAPI=1.53 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/7/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#457
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit codespell detsecrets xmllint compile spotbugs checkstyle
uname	Linux 2ff10113178c 5.15.0-164-generic #174-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 14 20:25:16 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	/home/jenkins/jenkins-home/workspace/tez-multibranch_PR-457/src/.yetus/personality.sh
git revision	master / `62fd11e`
Default Java	Ubuntu-21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/7/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	2097 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: tez-api . U: .
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/7/console
versions	git=2.43.0 maven=3.8.7 codespell=2.4.1
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.15.1 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

abstractdog · 2026-01-28T12:54:50Z

plexus-velocity solves the problem on my testing ubuntu server, but not in precommit, unfortunately, as a next step, I'm going for the yetus image and doing it inside

abstractdog · 2026-01-28T13:55:47Z

plexus-velocity solves the problem on my testing ubuntu server, but not in precommit, unfortunately, as a next step, I'm going for the yetus image and doing it inside

UPDATE: the pom.xml change solves the problem in the yetus docker container too for me locally...this is getting more and more interesting

in the failing job I can see:

[INFO] Downloading from maven2-repository.atlassian: https://maven.atlassian.com/repository/public/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-velocity/2.2.0/plexus-velocity-2.2.0.pom
[INFO] Downloading from central: https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-velocity/2.2.0/plexus-velocity-2.2.0.pom
[INFO] Downloaded from central: https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-velocity/2.2.0/plexus-velocity-2.2.0.pom (4.1 kB at 50 kB/s)

whereas for me locally:

Downloaded from central: https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-velocity/2.3.0/plexus-velocity-2.3.0.jar (6.2 kB at 66 kB/s)

apparently spotbugs in precommit doesn't depend on the fix

Aggarwal-Raghav · 2026-01-28T14:35:15Z

apparently spotbugs in precommit doesn't depend on the fix

Yes, looks like it:

tez/Jenkinsfile

Lines 119 to 120 in 03b5f1d

    
                                   # -1 spotbugs issues that show up prior to the patch being applied 
        
                                   # YETUS_ARGS+=("--spotbugs-strict-precheck")

So, if we merge this then for new PR's this change should be ok I believe!

abstractdog · 2026-01-28T14:40:02Z

apparently spotbugs in precommit doesn't depend on the fix

Yes, looks like it:

tez/Jenkinsfile

Lines 119 to 120 in 03b5f1d

# -1 spotbugs issues that show up prior to the patch being applied

# YETUS_ARGS+=("--spotbugs-strict-precheck")

So, if we merge this then for new PR's this change should be ok I believe!

I believe so, btw, not sure how "spotbugs-strict-precheck" is related to this behavior, how did you mean?

Aggarwal-Raghav · 2026-01-28T14:49:18Z

I believe so, btw, not sure how "spotbugs-strict-precheck" is related to this behavior, how did you mean?

My mistake, I got confused.

ayushtkn · 2026-01-28T15:06:51Z

I think SpotBugs passed:

It passes in the patch compile test, It failed in the master build, which is built without the patch. The way Yetus works is it builds first without the patch, that results in _master_compile_tests, then applies the patch and then again those tests. Since master is broken it will always be -1 there.

The patch results:
root:

https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/7/artifact/out/patch-spotbugs-root.txt
tez-api:
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/7/artifact/out/patch-spotbugs-tez-api.txt

Am I missing something?

abstractdog · 2026-01-28T15:08:26Z

I think SpotBugs passed: It passes in the patch compile test, It failed in the master build, which is built without the patch. The way Yetus works is it builds first without the patch, that results in _master_compile_tests, then applies the patch and then again those tests. Since master is broken it will always be -1 there.

The patch results: root:

https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/7/artifact/out/patch-spotbugs-root.txt tez-api: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/7/artifact/out/patch-spotbugs-tez-api.txt

Am I missing something?

LOL yes! :) the master branch doesn't contain the patch, that's the point
good catch, let me cleanup the patch

abstractdog · 2026-01-28T15:13:24Z

so with the patch:

[INFO] --- spotbugs-maven-plugin:4.9.3.0:spotbugs (default-cli) @ tez-api ---
[INFO] Downloading from maven2-repository.atlassian: https://maven.atlassian.com/repository/public/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-velocity/2.3.0/plexus-velocity-2.3.0.pom
[INFO] Downloading from central: https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-velocity/2.3.0/plexus-velocity-2.3.0.pom
[INFO] Downloaded from central: https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-velocity/2.3.0/plexus-velocity-2.3.0.pom (4.3 kB at 13 kB/s)

@ayushtkn : could this be merged now?

ayushtkn

LGTM.

One comment, feel free to merge once you change

ayushtkn · 2026-01-28T15:16:57Z

pom.xml

+            <dependency>
+              <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
+              <artifactId>plexus-velocity</artifactId>
+              <version>2.3.0</version>


Can you define it as a variable and use, all other dependencies have defined variable, I think we did that explicitly in some patch in past to define variable

hm, I was hesitating to do that: it's just a workaround that ideally should go away with a spotbugs upgrade, does it "deserve" a top-level property?

I would say lets keep the code in sync, once we upgrade and it is no longer required we can drop it like a normal dependency, it is just one more line to rollback and keep the code in sync

ack, it won't hurt :)
please see bef9055
assuming your approval holds with this change, I'm waiting for precommit tests

tez-yetus · 2026-01-29T11:05:09Z

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 46s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗	xmllint	0m 0s		xmllint was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	14m 48s		master passed
+1 💚	compile	2m 26s		master passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 50s		master passed
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	4m 43s		the patch passed
+1 💚	codespell	1m 47s		No new issues.
+1 💚	compile	2m 24s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javac	2m 24s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 17s		the patch passed
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	71m 39s		root in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 40s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		104m 6s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.53 ServerAPI=1.53 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/11/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#457
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit codespell detsecrets xmllint compile
uname	Linux dbf2fd162841 5.15.0-164-generic #174-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 14 20:25:16 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/tez-multibranch_PR-457/src/.yetus/personality.sh
git revision	master / `bef9055`
Default Java	Ubuntu-21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/11/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	1350 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: . U: .
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-457/11/console
versions	git=2.43.0 maven=3.8.7 codespell=2.4.1
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.15.1 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

abstractdog force-pushed the TEZ-4669 branch from c92a188 to e841c92 Compare January 26, 2026 15:15

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view

abstractdog force-pushed the TEZ-4669 branch from 68b6a6c to 69a7cb2 Compare January 27, 2026 07:14

abstractdog force-pushed the TEZ-4669 branch from 69a7cb2 to 4df638d Compare January 27, 2026 08:47

apache deleted a comment from tez-yetus Jan 27, 2026

abstractdog force-pushed the TEZ-4669 branch from 4df638d to a39157c Compare January 27, 2026 12:20

abstractdog force-pushed the TEZ-4669 branch from a39157c to 62fd11e Compare January 28, 2026 07:49

abstractdog force-pushed the TEZ-4669 branch from 62fd11e to de321b5 Compare January 28, 2026 14:20

abstractdog force-pushed the TEZ-4669 branch from de321b5 to 12c5a5b Compare January 28, 2026 15:09

abstractdog requested a review from ayushtkn January 28, 2026 15:09

abstractdog force-pushed the TEZ-4669 branch from 12c5a5b to bc7abd3 Compare January 28, 2026 15:11

ayushtkn approved these changes Jan 28, 2026

View reviewed changes

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view

TEZ-4669: Spotbugs fails in precommit

bef9055

abstractdog force-pushed the TEZ-4669 branch from bc7abd3 to bef9055 Compare January 29, 2026 09:20

abstractdog merged commit f09ba7f into apache:master Jan 29, 2026
4 checks passed

Conversation

abstractdog commented Jan 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Aggarwal-Raghav commented Jan 26, 2026

Uh oh!

tez-yetus commented Jan 26, 2026

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as outdated.

tez-yetus commented Jan 27, 2026

Uh oh!

ayushtkn commented Jan 27, 2026

Uh oh!

abstractdog commented Jan 27, 2026

Uh oh!

tez-yetus commented Jan 27, 2026

Uh oh!

abstractdog commented Jan 27, 2026

Uh oh!

Aggarwal-Raghav commented Jan 27, 2026

Uh oh!

tez-yetus commented Jan 28, 2026

Uh oh!

abstractdog commented Jan 28, 2026

Uh oh!

abstractdog commented Jan 28, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Aggarwal-Raghav commented Jan 28, 2026

Uh oh!

abstractdog commented Jan 28, 2026

Uh oh!

Aggarwal-Raghav commented Jan 28, 2026

Uh oh!

ayushtkn commented Jan 28, 2026

Uh oh!

abstractdog commented Jan 28, 2026

Uh oh!

abstractdog commented Jan 28, 2026

Uh oh!

ayushtkn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ayushtkn Jan 28, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

abstractdog Jan 28, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ayushtkn Jan 28, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

abstractdog Jan 29, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as outdated.

tez-yetus commented Jan 29, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

abstractdog commented Jan 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

abstractdog commented Jan 28, 2026 •

edited

Loading

abstractdog Jan 28, 2026 •

edited

Loading