Skip to content

Conversation

@davidradl
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: David Radley <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
Copy link

@rmoff rmoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for writing this @davidradl! I've left a few nits and suggestions.

Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
@davidradl davidradl requested review from rmoff and snuyanzin February 4, 2026 13:51
Copy link
Member

@featzhang featzhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is a "February 2026" update covering "January 2026," consider adding the publication date more prominently in the introduction to avoid confusion for future readers.
Additional Recommendations 📝

  1. Add Metrics: Consider adding quantitative data (e.g., "X PRs merged," "Y contributors active") to make the update more concrete.
  2. Call to Action: The closing section is good, but consider adding specific ways newcomers can contribute (e.g., "Good First Issues").
  3. Image/Visual: Consider adding a banner image or diagram to make the post more engaging.
  4. Consistency Check: Ensure all FLIP links are working and point to the correct Confluence pages.


## Summary of Apache Flink Dev List (covering January 2026)

AI summary.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⦁Which AI tool was used?
⦁Was this content reviewed by humans?
⦁Consider adding a note like: "The following section was generated with AI assistance and reviewed by the community."

Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
## Bringing us up to date - a brief summary of what has happened in Flink since 2020 up to end of 2025.
Since 2020, the Flink community has been very busy. Here is a flavour of what has improved.

* added many new connectors, moved out to their own repositories - increasing the reach of Flink flows.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rmoff I have not added hyperlinks for these - if you would like them I can add.

Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
@davidradl davidradl requested review from featzhang and rmoff February 6, 2026 10:46
@davidradl
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rmoff @rmetzger @snuyanzin I have addressed all concerns that have been raised. @featzhang has approved, I have not changed anything relating to his last comment.

Thank you all for your thorough reviews - I really appreciate it. I hope we can wrap this up soon, any further changes you want, before we publish?

@davidradl davidradl requested a review from rmetzger February 9, 2026 14:46
Signed-off-by: david_radley@uk.ibm.com <david_radley@uk.ibm.com>
@davidradl
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rmoff @rmetzger @snuyanzin up for review again. I have been burnt using some AI with this - every single piece it produced has been corrected / changed, so I have removed the reference to AI. It is all manual now - lesson learned :-)
Let me know if you see anything else I need to change .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants