Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Diego Ramírez <diegocrzt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Diego Ramírez <diegocrzt@gmail.com>
1 similar comment
|
Will this pr be merged? |
|
Something like this would be very helpful! I was really trying to get the json output it directly to disk and couldn't find a clean way to do it currently |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Considering #75, what do you think of having a
query_raw, almost the same asquery, but after doing the request, and parsing json/xml return the raw string response from the server, but doing the validations forremarkmessages.I am not sure if this is justified, I was using Overpy but really needed some transformations that requires the original response returned by OSM as base, so I ended up modifying overpy to do this.
Of course this could be improved but I wanted to know what you think about it.