London | 26-ITP-Jan | Kris Oldrini | Sprint 1 | Wireframe#1137
Open
XiaoQuark wants to merge 16 commits intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
Open
London | 26-ITP-Jan | Kris Oldrini | Sprint 1 | Wireframe#1137XiaoQuark wants to merge 16 commits intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
XiaoQuark wants to merge 16 commits intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
Conversation
… from summary length
✅ Deploy Preview for cyf-onboarding-module ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Learners, PR Template
Self checklist
Changelist
This PR updates the existing webpage to meet the assignment requirements based on the provided wireframe and acceptance criteria.
HTML
CSS
h1font size.Accessibility & Testing
alttext to all images.Git & Workflow
mainbefore opening this PR.Questions
I updated the “Read more” links to include more descriptive visible text to improve accessibility and pass the Lighthouse audit.
Is this the preferred approach, or would it be a better practice to keep the shorter visible text and use an additional accessibility attribute or visually hidden text specifically for screen readers instead?