Proguard is weak

[iamwahyd]

Hi,

I see in consumer-proguard-rules.pro these lines.:

-keep public class * {
public protected *;
}

if we include this library in a multi module project, Proguard keep ALL classes, even those are not in this library. (Indeed Android Studio Plugin append all Proguard files)

[matecode]

What is the right way to keep the public classes of this lib? should i instead use

-keep public class de.mateware.snacky.* {
    public protected *;
}

[SebastianIRodriguez]

What is the right way to keep the public classes of this lib? should i instead use

-keep public class de.mateware.snacky.* {
    public protected *;
}

This seems much better, because it'll only affect the library code and not the entire project in which it is used.
With the current configuration I can't correctly obfuscate a project in which I'm using Snacky. This fix would be very much appreciated.

[amarilindra]

Is the Proguard issue fixed in current version?

[matecode]

changed the consumer proguard file, hope everything is fine now ... looking for feedback