Skip to content

[ENH] add XGBoost Experiment integration #227

@SimonBlanke

Description

@SimonBlanke

This issue discusses if we should add a thin wrapper for the XGBoost integration. XGBoost already works with the sklearn-integration, because the estimators are so similar. Does it still make sense to add a class for an XGBoost integration to show users clearly, that this package is supported in Hyperactive, or show we just document in the sklearn integration, that XGBoost is supported?

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions